Zhejiang Province

Tian Weidong and Four Others, Robbery and Theft Case (田伟冬等五人抢劫、盗窃案)

The defendants/exonerees 

  • Tian Weidong (田伟冬), born in 1974 (21 at time of arrest in 1995)

  • Chen Jianyang (陈建阳), born in 1975 (20 at time of arrest in 1995)

  • Wang Jianping (王建平), born in 1976 (19 at time of arrest in 1995)

  • Zhu Youping (朱又平), born in 1975 (20 at time of arrest in 1995)

  • Tian Xiaoping (田孝平), born in 1977 (18 at time of arrest in 1995)

Facts

  • On March 20, 1995, Xu Caihua (female), a cab driver, was robbed and killed at a farm in Xiaoshan District of Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province. On August 12, 1995, another cab driver, Chen Jinjiang (male), was robbed and killed inside his cab in Xinjie Town of Xiaoshan District. The local police failed to make any progress investigating the two cases until November 15, 1995, when they were offered a lead by a woman who had been placed under the police compulsory measure called sheltering and investigation for alleged prostitution. The informant told the police that she heard from another woman named Zheng Caifang that three men from Xiaoshan District named Chen Jianyang, A Dong, and Jianping were hired to kill a male cab driver with knives. No record shows that the police interviewed Zheng Caifang to verify the source of the lead. Within two weeks, many young men in Xiaoshan District with “Jian,” “Ping” or “Dong” in their given names were taken to local police stations for investigation.

  • All five defendants were at that time considered problematic youths in their communities. One by one, the police placed them under sheltering and investigation. The first four defendants had known each other before the case, but none had met the fifth defendant until their trial.

  • Apart from the above two incidents, Chen Jianyang and Tian Weidong were charged with stealing RMB1,600 worth of valuables on September 2, 1995.

  • Also apart from the above incidents, on October 5, 1995, Tian Xiaoping was arrested on the scene of a robbery of two truck drivers and was charged with the robbery.

  • Other special facts about the case:

    • In the middle of 1995, Xiaoshan City had a months-long Strike Hard campaign.

    • In 1996, China conducted a nationwide Strike Hard campaign.

    • On March 17, 1996, the system of sheltering and investigation was formally abolished.

Procedural history 

  • On November 28, 1995, Wang Jianping was placed under custody by the police. Subsequently, the other defendants were placed under custody and all five defendants were placed under the compulsory measure of sheltering and investigation.

  • On September 28, 1996, the five defendants were formally arrested.

    Chen Jianyang, Tian Weidong, Zhu Youping and Tian Xiaoping were charged with (aggravated) robbery with the severe consequence of causing the death of Xu Caihua.

    Chen Jianyang, Tian Weidong, Wang Jianping and Tian Xiaoping were charged with (aggravated) robbery with the severe consequence of causing the death of Chen Jinjiang.

    Chen Jianyang and Tian Weidong were charged with theft.

    Tian Xiaoping was charged with the robbery that occurred on October 5, 1995.

  • On July 11, 1997, the Hangzhou Intermediate Court of Zhejiang Province convicted the defendants of the crimes charged and sentenced Chen Jianyang, Tian Weidong, and Wang Jianping to death; sentenced Zhu Youping to death with a two-year suspension; and sentenced Tian Xiaoping to life imprisonment. The first four defendants appealed to the Zhejiang Provincial High Court. The fifth defendant did not appeal.

  • On December 29, 1997, the Zhejiang Provincial High Court reduced the sentence of the first three defendants to death with two years’ suspension. It sustained the sentence of the fourth defendant.

Date of the convictions

July 11, 1997

Date the wrongful convictions were reversed

July 2, 2013

Days incarcerated

31,590 (total for five defendants)

Why was the case reopened/reversed 

Tian Weidong and Wang Jianping protested their innocence throughout their trials and continued after their convictions. On July 27, 2011, during a campaign to crack down on murders in Zhejiang Province, the Hangzhou police discovered that fingerprints of Xiang Shengyuan, a person with criminal history of robbery and theft, matched a bloody fingerprint found at the crime scene of the March 20, 1995 robbery. Xiang was arrested on January 4, 2013, and was convicted of murder and sentenced to death with a two-year suspension by the Jiaxing Intermediate Court of Zhejiang Province on May 30, 2013. On January 4, 2013, Zhejiang Provincial High Court realized the error and started reviewing the case of the five other men. On May 21, 2013, the Zhejiang Provincial High Court decided to re-open the case. On July 2, 2013, the Zhejiang Provincial High Court announced that the five defendants were not guilty of robbery on March 20, 1995 and August 12, 1995. The retrial found that Chen Jianyang and Tian Weidong were guilty of theft, and that Tian Xiaoping was guilty of the robbery that occurred on October 5, 1995.

Factors contributing to the wrongful convictions

False confessions

  • The five defendants were sleep-deprived and physically tortured. They all suffered from broken fingers and other bones. Due to torture, Tian Weidong tried to kill himself by biting off part of his tongue. All five recanted their confessions many times. Many details in their confessions did not match the crime scenes.

Problematic forensic evidence

  • A bloody fingerprint found at the scene did not match any of the five defendants. The Hangzhou police could not find a match to any other suspects at that time, so they decided to pursue their investigation against the five. Fingerprints reportedly found on a stone, which allegedly had been used to kill a victim, were not collected. Other weapons, wires, and knives, which were allegedly used to kill the victims, were not found by the police.

Prosecutorial errors

  • The case files show that prosecutors had 34 witnesses, but none of them was called to testify in court.

Court's errors

  • The Zhejiang High Court had found the case unclear and the evidence insufficient, but none of the judges of the collegial panel decided the five defendants should be free until the new president of the Zhejiang High Court took his position.

Other developments

  • A judge from the Zhejiang High Court issued an apology for the court’s mistakes involving the case and for causing the defendants to lose 17 years of freedom.

  • The five defendants applied for state compensation in 2013. As of May 17, 2020, their compensation cases were still pending.

Information sources

Zhang Hui, Zhang Gaoping Rape Case (张辉、张高平强奸案)

The defendants/exonerees

  • Zhang Gaoping (张高平), born in 1965

  • Zhang Hui (张辉), born in 1976

Facts

  • In the evening of May 18, 2003, as requested by a friend, Zhang Hui and Zhang Gaoping gave a ride to a 17-year old girl from Anhui Province to Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province while en route to deliver electric cables to one of their clients in Shanghai. The next morning, the girl was found dead and naked in a ditch in a suburb of Hangzhou. The police found the phone numbers of the Zhangs on the victim’s person and therefore detained them on May 23, 2003. On June 28, 2003, the police arrested the Zhangs. The Zhangs were convicted of rape on April 21, 2004.

  • Zhang Hui and Zhang Gaoping are relatives of each other. Zhang Hui is the nephew, and Zhang Gaoping is the uncle.

  • Other special facts about this case:

    • The Zhangs claimed that they dropped off the girl in Hangzhou in the early morning of May 19, 2003. They insisted that they are innocent.

    • Yuan Lianfang, a cellmate and the head of the Zhangs’ cell room during pretrial detention, forced them to copy out a pre-written confession letter.

Procedural history 

  • On April 21, 2004, Zhang Gaoping and Zhang Hui were convicted of rape by the Hangzhou Intermediate Court. Zhang Hui was sentenced to death and Zhang Gaoping was sentenced to life imprisonment.

  • On October 19, 2004, the Zhejiang Province High Court commuted both of their sentences upon appeal. Zhang Hui was sentenced to death with two-year suspension and Zhang Gaoping was sentenced to 15 years in prison.

Date of the convictions

April 21, 2004

Date the wrongful convictions were reversed

March 26, 2013

Days incarcerated

7,192 (total for two defendants)

Why was the case reopened/reversed 

  • Zhang Gaoping, Zhang Hui and his father Zhang Gaofa, had continuously petitioned even after the convictions.

  • On March 18, 2005, Zhang Gaoping learned while watching TV in the prison that a man named Gou Haifeng, a former taxi driver and criminal offender was executed for murdering a young girl in a suburb of Hangzhou. Zhang Gaoping thought that Gou might be the real perpetrator in his case because of the similar victim profiles, the similar locations where the bodies were found, and the similar method of killing.

  • In 2008, Zhang Gaoping read an article about another case where the defendant, Ma Tingxin, was also compelled to confess by Yuan Lianfang. The Zhangs believed that Yuan is the same cellmate who beat and forced them into confession. Zhang Hui mailed this article to his father Zhang Gaofa; and Zhang Gaoping provided this article to a prosecutor named Zhang Biao (not related), who was in charge of supervising the prison where Zhang Gaoping was serving his time.

  • At the same time, Zhang Gaoping’s stubborn and consistent refusal to comply with prison rules attracted the attention of the local procuratorate.

  • Through investigation, prosecutor Zhang Biao found that Yuan Lianfang was a prisoner used by the police in multiple cases to help extort confessions from other inmates. Zhang Biao reported his finding to his supervisors and other government agencies and kept bringing this case to his supervisors’ attention till it was reopened.

  • Zhang Gaofa and prosecutor Zhang Biao finally found Ma Tingxin’s lawyer who agreed to provide free legal aid to Zhang Hui. The lawyer, Zhu Mingyong, later found that court documents showed that Yuan Lianfang had received sentence commutation twice when he was sent to other detention centers to assist the police in closing cases.

  • In 2010, lawyer Zhu started filing petitions with the court to re-open the Zhangs’ case.

  • On November 21, 2011, the Dongfang Daily newspaper reported on the suspicious facts in the Zhangs’ case and the identity of Yuan Lianfang. The next day, the Hangzhou police checked the DNA sample in Zhangs’ case against that of Gou Haifeng’s, who had been executed for his previous crimes, and found a match.

  • The media reports on this case accelerated the re-opening of this case. The police finally checked the DNA evidence they should have checked six years earlier.

  • On February 27, 2012, the Zhejiang Provincial High Court re-opened the case and organized a new collegial bench to rehear the case.

  • On March 20, 2013, the Zhejiang High Court retried the Zhangs’ case and publicly announced that the defendants are not guilty six days later.

Factors contributing to the wrongful convictions

False confessions

  • The Zhangs were severely tortured, both physically and mentally, by the police. They were deprived of food and sleep. The police used their cellmate Yuan Lianfang to extort false confessions from the Zhangs.

  • The Zhangs also underwent police interrogation for seven consecutive days and nights.

Problematic forensic evidence

  • The DNA sample, which was found in the victim’s finger nails, did not match the Zhangs. But the judgment explained that victim might have caught the DNA sample from somewhere else. Therefore, it did not prove that the defendants had not committed the crime.

Defense lawyer's errors/absence

  • None. Both defendants were represented by lawyers who maintained their innocence.

Court's errors

  • Did not exclude illegally obtained evidence. Failed to uphold the presumption of innocence. In the final retrial, the Zhejiang High Court finally excluded the illegally obtained evidence it had originally admitted.

Other developments

  • Nie Haifen, a police officer who was in charge of investigation in this case, was rewarded by the Hangzhou Police in 2006 for her extraordinary service for more than 20 years. In her promotion materials, it stated that she had “led the investigation of over 350 serious and major cases in the past five years. Her cases were 100% accurately resolved. … no wrongful convictions …”

  • On May 17, 2013, the Zhejiang High Court decided that the Zhangs were entitled to State compensation totaling 2.21 million RMB (last updated June 20, 2022).

Information sources