Taiwan’s recent general elections were accompanied by extensive attacks of online misinformation designed to confuse and disrupt the process. Authors Wen-Chen Chang and Yu-teng Lin argue that Taiwan’s response to these attacks embodies “civic constitutionalism” in action, with civil society organizations taking the lead to identify and correct the misinformation while the government played a supporting role.
Taiwan’s Citizen Judges Act: Part III
Taiwan’s Citizen Judges Act: Part II
Lay adjudication can give citizens a meaningful role in the administration of justice and may boost their confidence in the courts. However, the use of lay adjudication also may raise questions about the extent to which systems can deliver a fair trial and the safeguards needed to assure accused persons that the system of adjudication is independent and impartial.
Taiwan’s Citizen Judges Act: Part I
In 2020, after years of advocacy by judicial reformers, Taiwan’s legislature passed the Citizen Judges Act, providing for professional judges to share their benches - and their power - with lay judges in a relatively small subset of criminal cases. The law takes effect January 2023. USALI Perspectives invited six experts in Taiwan’s judicial system to unpack the practical challenges and potential larger significance of this seemingly small step.
Exonerating Those They Prosecuted: Prosecutorial Reforms in China, the US, and Taiwan
Traditionally, prosecutors have focused on putting criminals in jail. That narrow focus is now broadening to some extent on both sides of the Pacific as prosecutors in China, Taiwan, and the United States give significant attention to redressing wrongful convictions. The following is a brief comparison of reform efforts in those three jurisdictions.