The deepening polarization in South Korean politics triggered a constitutional crisis last December when President Yoon Seok-yeol declared martial law out of frustration with the opposition-controlled National Assembly. Eungi Hong writes that when the South Korean Constitutional Court upheld President Yoon’s impeachment, it sought to bridge the deep political divides and remind all citizens in clear, accessible language what it means to have a democracy. She also provides an unofficial English translation of the full court decision.
South Korea’s President on Trial: An Explainer
South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol’s unexpected and short-lived declaration of martial law on December 3, 2024 presented severe challenges to the nation’s legal and political systems. Eungi Hong writes that the responses of other institutions, especially the courts, may serve as a testament to the resilience of South Korea’s Constitution and democracy.
Young Climate Activists Win Big in South Korea
Last August, a group of youthful plaintiffs in South Korea unexpectedly won their lawsuit charging that the government’s official greenhouse gas reduction targets were unconstitutionally inadequate. It was the first victory outside Europe against a national climate target. Sejong Youn, the plaintiffs’ lawyer, writes that more wins may follow, as youths in Japan and Taiwan also have sued their respective governments this year. He says that courts are increasingly stepping forward to protect a vulnerable minority - future generations - from discrimination by an indifferent majority.